Per Clarke J. delivering the judgment of the court: “…the problem with arrangements not being adequately converted into a legally recognisable form is that significant problems can be encountered if things go wrong.”
In this case the tenant was offered a reduced rent in return for what appeared to be a promise to surrender the lease at the landlord’s option. The landlord subsequently served what purported to be a notice of termination. It became important to establish whether this notice actually terminated the lease. The High Court found that the lease had been terminated (ironically this was good news for the tenant as it entitled it to a new lease at reduced rent) but the Supreme Court took a different view and found the tenant still bound by the original lease (which carried ‘Celtic tiger’ rent.)
If you are thinking of engaging a lawyer, why not contact us today to see if we can assist? Any of our solicitors will be delighted to speak with you without obligation.